Bibliophile Lass (bibliogirl) wrote,
Bibliophile Lass
bibliogirl


Hypothetically speaking, if I were thinking of replacing my 28-80mm lens on my Canon with something a bit more up-market, what would be your arguments for and against:

(1) Canon EF 24-70 f2.8L

vs

(2) Canon EF 24-105mm f4L IS

vs

(3) Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8 IS


(1) is the best match in terms of range for what I am replacing, and it's also L-series (which is a major, major plus point) -- but it doesn't have IS, and having experienced it on my new long lens, I rather like it! (2) is slightly longer range and _does_ have IS, but is only f4. (3) isn't an L-series, and is also restricted to use on smaller frame sensors -- no problem at the moment, but if I ever win the lottery and upgrade to a 5D or a 1D (or their successors), I won't be able to use that lens with the new body. (One might argue that if I won the lottery I wouldn't care. ;))

They're all around the same sort of price level; (3) is slightly cheaper than the other two but there isn't a whole lot in it.

Before anyone suggests it, I'm not _especially_ interested in non-Canon lenses -- while I'm sure they've improved a lot over recent years, my experiences with Sigma and other similar lenses have not been all that great.

And before anyone suggests "switch to Nikon": er, no. ;)

Hmm.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 28 comments